Simon Riggs wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 15:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > >> Could we report both? > > > > > Yes, we could easily do that if we want to. > > > > It would be entirely silly to do so, since (a) the old value hasn't > > been changed if we fail here, and (b) it's irrelevant to the nature > > of the error. > > That's reasonable. If it is impossible to set it to an > impossible/failing value then that is even better. > > Magnus seems to say it is possible to set this and then have it fail > later when it is used. Not sure which is correct.
It shouldn't ever happen. It happened here because there was a bug in my original patch, that has now been fixed. So unless there are more bugs in it, it is now back to can't happen. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
