Tom Lane wrote: > [email protected] (Magnus Hagander) writes: >> pgsql/src/test/regress: >> pg_regress.c (r1.57 -> r1.58) >> >> (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c?r1=1.57&r2=1.58) > > Surely this patch is wrong. It is suppressing, not fixing, a critical > warning about a datatype mismatch.
You mean the signed vs unsigned part? Other than that, int and dword are always the same on win32... //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
