Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]> writes:
> A completely different approach would be to treat any failure on all
> platforms as non-fatal. We shouldn't really cut the checkpoint short if
> recycling a WAL file fails, whatever the reason. That seems like a more
> robust approach than trying to guess which error codes are OK to ignore.
I could live with that, as long as it gets logged.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
