On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 15:22, Michael Meskes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:45:05PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> You probably want to do this on backbranches as well. Otherwise we're >> going to have to maintain it in some branches and not in some (which >> we *will* make mistakes if we try). And keeping it in there but not >> maintaining it is even worse... > > TTBOMK the file has never been maintained in backbranched but always carried > the release time status. I fail to see the advantage here.
Hmm, so we've basically been shipping out of date changelogs in backbranches? That seems Bad (TM).. Anyway, I vote for removing it there as well, but if you wan to keep it, I don't care *that* much. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
