Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 16:46, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Possibly more to the point, where are we using INADDR_NONE anyway?
> In the RADIUS code.
Oh, that's why it isn't in my tree and has zero portability track record ...
I think what this shows is we should look for a way to avoid using
INADDR_NONE. What's your grounds for believing it's portable at all?
In the Single Unix Spec I only see INADDR_ANY and INADDR_BROADCAST
defined.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
