On 13.12.2010 16:10, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 13.12.2010 16:01, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:23 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 13.12.2010 14:56, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 17:02 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Simon Riggs<[email protected]>
wrote:
Self review of previous patch. Fix assumption that xmax>= xmin.
This seems to require backporting. No?
Already done.
Nope, that follow-on patch is not in REL9_0_STABLE.
Yes, it is.
The work was bundled together and the commit messages differ.
No, it's not. See for yourself:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c;h=1c934007b2edbe97e548a7e84fe5802b6b8c5c98;hb=refs/heads/REL9_0_STABLE#l3812
Sorry, I was wrong and you were right. Looks like I need to visit the
optician...
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
