Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Suppress some "variable might be clobbered by longjmp" warnings. > >> > >> Seen with an older gcc version. I'm not sure these represent any real > >> risk factor, but still a bit scary. Anyway we have lots of other > >> volatile-marked variables in this code, so a couple more won't hurt. > > > I assume you saw my comment in basebackup.c: > > > * Some old compilers, e.g. gcc 2.95.3/x86, think that passing > > * a struct in the same function as a longjump might clobber > > * a variable. bjm 2011-02-04 > > * http://lists.apple.com/archives/xcode-users/2003/Dec//msg00051.html > > Curious that you're getting different warnings with that than I get > with HPPA 2.95.3.
Yes. I just found the description at the URL interesting, stating the gcc just gets confused. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
