On 23 March 2011 20:58, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Improve user-defined-aggregates documentation. > > On closer inspection, that two-element initcond value seems to have been > a little white lie to avoid explaining the full behavior of float8_accum. > But if people are going to expect the examples to be exactly correct, > I suppose we'd better explain. Per comment from Thom Brown. > > Branch > ------ > REL9_0_STABLE > > Details > ------- > http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03c77337209f0b2b3059d6ee9df2f94c6f66d910 > > Modified Files > -------------- > doc/src/sgml/xaggr.sgml | 16 +++++++++++----- > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Thanks Mr Lane :) -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
