On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Unbreak legacy syntax "COMMENT ON RULE x IS y", with no relation name. > > check_object_ownership() isn't happy about the null relation pointer. > We could fix it there, but this seems more future-proof. > > Branch > ------ > REL9_1_STABLE > > Details > ------- > http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a60c16db5f36562df571d36fcacbbed33fd40bd4 > > Modified Files > -------------- > src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c | 5 +++++ > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Woops. This was a live bug only on the master branch. I mistakenly thought 9.1 had the same issue, but it turns out to have been introduced by commit c533c1477f6beede766034c1226a20ac08320b05. I didn't notice that the rebase over 9.1 worked out to only a comment change. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
