On Monday, December 12, 2011 07:48:01 PM Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On Monday, December 12, 2011 09:29:23 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> Revert the behavior of inet/cidr functions to not unpack the arguments. > > > > Whats the plan to handle this wrt a stable release? > > I was wondering whether we shouldn't revert the original patch > altogether in the back branches. As far as I'd heard, there were > no reports of the previous coding causing real trouble, and this > episode demonstrates that there is a possibility to make things > worse rather than better. I think maybe we'd better treat this > change as something to make in HEAD only. +1
-- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
