Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue dic 22 18:39:18 -0300 2011:
>> Robert Haas <rh...@postgresql.org> writes:
>>> Add a security_barrier option for views.
>> Where's the catversion bump for having broken stored rules/views?
> I'm starting to wonder if we should have a git hook of some sort to
> check for this ...
Dunno, how would you automate that?
My rule of thumb is that touching either src/include/catalog/* or
readfuncs.c probably means you need a catversion bump. It's the
"probably" that's a problem for automated enforcement. I don't
want unnecessary catversion bumps happening just because some tool
is preventing a commit.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
