Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 01/30/2012 10:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another aspect of this is that when the same-or-almost-the-same patch
>> is applied to multiple branches, it's a *lot* easier for future
>> archeology in the commit logs if the patch goes into all the affected
>> branches at the same time (and with the same commit message, please).
> Yeah, I've been pinged on this before, for exactly this reason. It makes
> release note preparation significantly easier, AIUI.
Not just release notes, but routine questions like "when was this bug
fixed, and in which branches?". I keep a regularly-updated copy of
the output of src/tools/git_changelog (before git we used cvs2cl
to get similar output from CVS). It's a rare day that I don't have
some occasion to consult it. I don't appreciate committers randomly
cluttering that log by making commits that the tool doesn't know how
to merge.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
