On 05/05/2012 12:36 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 05:04:24PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
On 5 May 2012 17:00, Bruce Momjian<[email protected]> wrote:
Fix psql doc typo.
Are you sure about this? Looked fine before.
The change is:
- For some types of relation,<literal>\d</> shows additional
information
+ For some types of relations,<literal>\d</> shows additional
information
Isn't 'types' plural so 'relations' has to be plural. I saw this while
working on the release notes.
Yes, "types" is plural, but that doesn't mean that "relation" is
necessarily wrong here, AFAIK. I don't see why you can't have plural
types of a singular category. If you can cite a rule of English grammar
to the contrary I'd like to see it.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
