On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:18:18PM +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On 22 May 2012 22:17, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > > Remove reviewers from 9.2 release notes; improve attributions. > > I am unhappy with now being listed as a secondary author of > pg_stat_statements normalisation. I am credited as a co-author within > the docs (alongside the original 8.4 author, Takahiro Itagaki), and am > solely credited within the original commit message. Tom did of course > clean up the patch, but most of my earlier design decisions, many of > which went against the grain until very late in the last commitfest, > remain. > > These include: > > * The whole decision as to what type of tree to hash. I was strongly > urged to first consider hashing plan trees, and then later the raw > parse tree. I more-or-less stood by my earliest decision to hash a > serialisation of the Query struct (though switched to pre rather than > post rewrite stage hashing). > > * The jumble concept (central to how the feature works), macro > infrastructure, etc. > > * The decision to not use the query_tree_walker infrastructure when > walking trees. > > * The whole idea of using the low-level scanner API to calculate the > lengths of constants, which were not directly available from the core > system. > > * The approach to managing sticky-entry decay, and indeed the very > idea of sticky entries.
OK, I have updated you as primary author. The problem happened because of the method I used ot remove, then add additional authors. Sorry about that. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
