Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> writes:
> Perhaps I'm asking a naive question, but wouldn't it be easier if
> people had the opportunity to use the buildfarm without actually
> committing something?
Why? The whole point of the buildfarm is to break, as it were.
I don't see the value of adding more bureaucracy in order to keep
it from breaking.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
