On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 05:55:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> writes: > > On 08/04/2012 03:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I'm not sure if we have any project policy for minimum required Perl > >> version, but I've not found that any of our other Perl scripts don't > >> work with 5.8. > > > Well, It's at least in 5.10.1 which dates from 3 years ago. I suspect > > it's probably in 5.10.0 which dates from about 5 years ago. I guess this > > is the danger of developing on modern systems :-) How old is the > > compiler you use for everyday work? > > I intentionally use oldest-supported-versions of tools on my HPPA box, > to keep us honest on that front. It's running gcc 2.95.3, since you > asked, but that's not too relevant to the immediate question: what do > we consider our oldest supported version of Perl? If we decide it's > not 5.8, I'll reinstall that ... but allowing \h seems a pretty lame > excuse for ratcheting up a whole major release series.
Tom, please make whatever changes you wish so it works for you. There is no reason pgindent should cause a newer Perl to be required. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
