Re-think guts of DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY. Concurrent behaviour was flawed when using a two-step process, so add an additional phase of processing to ensure concurrency for both SELECTs and INSERT/UPDATE/DELETEs.
Backpatch to 9.2 Andres Freund, tweaked by me Branch ------ master Details ------- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/2f0e480d02cde469e64d03dc8ca198cbfd597640 Modified Files -------------- src/backend/catalog/index.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
