On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:15:30PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 05:39:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> You would have been better off keeping the array and sorting it so you > >> could use binary search, instead of passing the problem off to the > >> filesystem. > > > Well, testing showed using open() was a big win. > > ... on the filesystem you tested on. I'm concerned that it might not > look so good on other platforms.
True. I am on ext3. So I need to generate a proof-of-concept patch and have others test it? -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
