Le vendredi 5 juillet 2013 15:44:55, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Cédric Villemain <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Expose the estimation of number of changed tuples since last analyze > >> > >> This value, now pg_stat_all_tables.n_mod_since_analyze, was already > >> tracked and used by autovacuum, but not exposed to the user. > > > > I though you agreed on a shorter name ? (n_mod_tuple ?) > > No, I suggested a shorter name, but was convinced that this would > likely be more confusing..
I understand (I read the review thread). is it correct to interpret that as the number of tuples bloating the table ? I supposed that hot_update was not tracked for autovacuum task, but I have a doubt now . -- Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
