On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Surely not. It seems like a much better idea to not have lzcompress deal >> with varlena at all but pass that responsibility one layer upwards. That >> shouldn't be very hard. I'll figure out something.
> and as noted, it's going to take additional refactoring to make it > possible to do that in pg_lzcompress. In view of all the potentially > unportable stuff Andres committed today, we need the buildfarm to be > at full strength; so I've reverted this commit until it can be worked > out a bit better. Makes sense. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
