* Andrew Dunstan (and...@dunslane.net) wrote: > On 05/18/2015 08:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >and...@anarazel.de (Andres Freund) writes: > >>On 2015-05-19 00:08:05 +0000, Tom Lane wrote: > >>>Note: for lack of a suitable testing environment, I've not really exercised > >>>this change. I trust the buildfarm will show up any mistakes. > >>Shouldn't src/test/modules/dummy_seclabel/ exercise this without further > >>dependencies? > >I have no idea how thoroughly that tests it --- I was assuming we'd need > >to see a run from contrib/sepgsql to be sure it's OK. > > The buildfarm has no support for contrib/sepgsql
Right, that's on my list of things to address, though I'm not
particularly worried about the changes being made.
I expect we'll have some additional changes to sepgsql to discuss for
9.6, once we're ready to discuss such.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
