On 2015-08-10 11:19:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Meh. I think we'd agreed in another nearby thread that pageinspect > is exactly the sort of thing we don't want in core.
I think we agreed that it shouldn't be included in an initdb'ed database, but that doesn't preclude pageinspect being an extension in src/extension or something. > Even if it were > in core, I'm dubious that it's a good way to implement the desired > testing here: the risks of platform-dependent results (endianness, > varying numbers of tuples per page, etc etc) seem far too high. That on the other hand I can agree with being a danger. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
