On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Michael Meskes <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 23.07.2015 09:19, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Michael Meskes <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> This routine was calling ecpg_alloc to allocate to memory but did not
>>> actually check the returned pointer allocated, potentially NULL which
>>> could be the result of a malloc call.
>>>
>>> Issue noted by Coverity, fixed by Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
>>
>> Coming back to it, perhaps this meritates a backpatch? Even if that's
>> unlikely to happen...
>
> cherry-picked and pushed to all back branches.
>
> Sorry, the disadvantage of testing in master for a while, I simply
> forgot about this change.

No pb. Thanks! I forgot myself...
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers

Reply via email to