On 9 January 2016 at 12:23, Andres Freund <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2016-01-09 10:13:27 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/nbtdesc.c | 2 +-
>
> I've not reviewed the patch, but a very quick glance during a rebase
> with conflicts showed:
>
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ btree_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
> {
> xl_btree_vacuum *xlrec = (xl_btree_vacuum *) rec;
>
> - appendStringInfo(buf, "lastBlockVacuumed %u",
> + appendStringInfo(buf, "lastBlockVacuumed %d",
> xlrec->lastBlockVacuumed);
> break;
> }
>
> which doesn't look right?
>
It's right. New value of -1 allowed in that field, so change required to
allow it to display properly for debug.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
