On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > We can, if you wish, revert this patch. If we do, we will have nothing, >> > since I object to the other patch(es). >> >> I don't think you have an absolute veto over other patches > > Huh? My understanding is I have the same powers as other committers, no more > but also, no less. If you've seen me claim otherwise, please point where > that happened.
Uh, that would be in the portion that is still quoted. "If we do, we will have nothing, since I object to the other patches." > Me saying "I object" seems to attract more attention than others for some > reason. Why is it a discussion point that I object to a patch, whereas if > you do it, thats fine? You have every right to object to the patch. You don't have a right, nor do I, to say that it won't be committed without your agreement. > All very strange. People commit changes they didn't post all the time, > especially on minor bugs such as this. No, they really don't. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
