Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1. I wonder if this should be reverted entirely.
> I really wish I could have done more to help with this, but I didn't
> do enough soon enough. Regrettably, I think that the patch just isn't
> ready. For example, the way that expression indexes just aren't
> handled is a cause for concern, as is the general way in which high
> keys are modified during index builds. Interactions with logical
> decoding are also a concern; there could be significant issues there,
> but that analysis just didn't happen. I had significant
> misunderstandings about the patch as recently as this week.
> This should be reverted.
Given those concerns, this *clearly* was not ready to commit.
Please revert, Teodor.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
