On 12/15/16 3:46 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >>> Okay in case we decide it's the right way to go attached patch does >>> that. I also added some more tests based on your feedback while I am at it. >> >> This looks mostly reasonable to me, but the location and xid output from >> pg_logical_slot_get_changes() is not portable/repeatable, so it should >> be omitted from the output. >> > > Sigh, yes you are right.
committed -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
