>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
Tom> Hm, buildfarm results suggest this test is not entirely stable: I see it and will work on it. Tom> I have not looked very closely, but I'm suspicious that the test Tom> case depends on no autovacuum transactions running concurrently Tom> with it. Disabling autovac on the table itself is not enough to Tom> control whether global xmin is being held back by some other Tom> autovac transaction somewhere. Aren't vacuum transactions ignored for that? vacuum_set_xid_limits is certainly passing ignoreVacuum=true to GetOldestXmin. -- Andrew. -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers