[re-adding commiters which I inadvertently left off]
On 09/30/2017 06:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > >> I was just looking at this. Why aren't we using "pg_ctl kill" to >> terminate the backend? That's supposed to be portable. > Because pg_ctl can't do that for any process but postmaster, no? The > test is supposed to find issues with backend death (and has > defficiencies in error reporting already, and would have caught a bug > I'd introduced previously). > No, I don't think so. That's not what the docs say. That's why you give it a pid argument" "pg_ctl kill signal_name process_id" cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
