Make OWNER TO subcommand mention consistent We say 'OWNER TO' in the synopsis; let's use that form elsewhere.
There is a paragraph in the <note> section that refers to various subcommands very loosely (including OWNER); I didn't think it was an improvement to change that one. This is a fairly inconsequential change, so no backpatch. Author: Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/69ec7b51-03e5-f523-95ce-c070ee790...@lab.ntt.co.jp Branch ------ master Details ------- https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/bf54c0f05c0a58db17627724a83e1b6d4ec2712c Modified Files -------------- doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_table.sgml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers