On 2017-11-07 14:12:19 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2017-11-07 17:57:31 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > >> Remove secondary checkpoint > > > FWIW, I don't think this should be applied without a pg_resetxlog > > feature allowing to manually use older checkpoints. > > Uh, what? We have never before insisted on pg_resetxlog being able > to use WAL across a WAL format change, and there have been many of > those.
I think you misunderstand my point - I'm saying that pg_resetxlog should be able to force the use of older checkpoints, basically as a fallback to cases where the previous approach might actually have worked, not that it needs to work across format changes. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
