Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2/5/18 18:51, Tom Lane wrote: >> So I can see two ways to approach this: add two new subsections at the end >> of xindex.sgml, or create a new chapter about b-trees in Part VII >> ("Internals") to go beside the existing ones about the more recently added >> index types. The latter would make more sense if anyone was inspired to >> write something comparable in length to the existing per-index-type >> chapters. But I'm not volunteering to do that, so if it's a chapter it'd >> be a mighty thin one to start with.
> xindex seems better to me. Oh, I already did it as a chapter. I'm inclined to think that somebody will want to write something more there someday, and anyway it's already longer than some existing chapters ... regards, tom lane