On 08/25/2018 10:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:25:25AM +0300, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
On 06/20/2018 05:04 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
         I have split them in two just in case rn-typos.patch conflicts with any
         current work on release-11.sgml, which seems to be going on in more
         than one thread. I'll appreciate your feedback if it should have been
         done differently.

I have bumped into a couple of similar typos in 9.6 and 10 - the patch based on
REL9_6_STABLE is attached.
I have made the adjustments to 9.6 and 10 as you suggested.  I added
quoting to "two" to match other releases:

        
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/993b5a78adff29fc58e7449cab98bb865b77c663

Thanks.

Thank you, Bruce!

I totally missed those quotes (and your response).
I've just noticed your recent commit, and looks like the typo to be fixed ("boundries") managed to escape somehow. Assuming it's not an alternative spelling I'm unaware of, I'm attaching a smaller version of the patch (based on the current state of REL_10_STABLE).

--
Liudmila Mantrova
Technical writer at Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/pgtrgm.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/pgtrgm.sgml
index 8e50f79..edc0813 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/pgtrgm.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/pgtrgm.sgml
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@
    greatest similarity between the first string and any substring of the second
    string.  However, this function does not add padding to the boundaries of
    the extent.  Thus, the number of additional characters present in the
-   second string is not considered, except for the mismatched word boundries.
+   second string is not considered, except for the mismatched word boundaries.
   </para>
 
   <table id="pgtrgm-op-table">

Reply via email to