On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 8:04 AM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> Sorry, but I don't like this wording. The problem is that the > comparison has two row sets --- the left-hand side, and the right-hand > side. Huh...the left hand side must be a non-set scalar or row constructor. Each row on the left-hand side is compared with the row set on > the right. I also don't like people thinking about the result of ANY > since it is really <comparison> ANY that is being used. > Then there is some more rewording to be done since: "The result of ANY is “true” if any true result is obtained." (v10; 9.22.4) Maybe: The result of ANY is “true” if the comparison returns true for any subquery row; otherwise the result is “false” (or NULL if any of the comparisons result in unknown) David J.
