On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 01:24:22AM +0300, Maksim Milyutin wrote: > Yeah, I think the notion *remote_flush level* is more appropriate especially > in the context of sync replication. Within this context maybe it makes sense > to replace the word *level* to *value* in description of *flush_lag*?
I am not sure that this is an improvement. Anyway, I have committed your original patch as that's clearly a mistake and back-patched down to v10. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
