On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 06:11:55PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > In PG v10 and up this link goes to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7159. > Evidently whoever updated it didn't bother to back-patch into old > branches.
I don't think that really cool to have user-facing documentation which goes to the void on supported branches, especially if there is an adequate replacement. Tom, do you think that this is worth updating? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
