On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 02:17:33PM +0300, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> As an example of such differences I append two files: gin.svg ("Optimized
> SVG" plus my manually optimizations; the originally uploaded file) and
> gin_pure_opt.svg (pure "Optimized SVG").
>
> What is your opinion? Should we renounce the additional manual step and use
> only the pure "Optimized SVG" format? This will increase the
> 'diff-ablility', which may be valuable in the long term. But direct
> readability of the files suffers more or less.
Uh, so really there is plain SVG, "Optimized SVG", and readable SVG. I
am thinking you should store just "Optimized SVG", and provide a shell
script to convert to readable SVG for those that want it.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
