On 4/24/19 4:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2019-04-23 18:53, Tom Lane wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>> On 2019-04-23 16:15, Joe Conway wrote: >>>> I don't think so. Not sure if you have an account at Red Hat, but this >>>> ticket covers it: >>>> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/48199 >> >>> That discusses the equally-named export options on the NFS server, not >>> the mount options on the NFS client. >> >> Well, the DBA might also be the NFS server's admin, so I think we ought >> to explain the correct settings on both ends. > > Right, the slight confusion in this thread indicates that this is worth > explaining further.
And the confusion is aided by the fact that prior to NFS 3 sync *was* necessary on the client side. Yeah I know, ancient, so maybe only old folks like me get confused ;-), but NFS 2 was probably current when this was originally written. See: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ "safe asynchronous writes." > New version attached. Looks reasonable to me. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
