Hello,
According to patch[1] and after playing with v12 beta1 I think that this
item can be dropped from "5.11.3. Implementation Using Inheritance"
section of v12 docs:
"Some operations require a stronger lock when using declarative
partitioning than when using table inheritance. For example, adding or
removing a partition to or from a partitioned table requires taking an
ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock on the parent table, whereas a SHARE UPDATE
EXCLUSIVE lock is enough in the case of regular inheritance."
Small patch attached.
[1] ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAKJS1f9QjUwQrio20Pi=ychmnouf4z3sfn8sqxaacwreg6k...@mail.gmail.com
--
-----
Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
index ed2d9c60d5..f9feec3125 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
@@ -4057,17 +4057,6 @@ ALTER INDEX measurement_city_id_logdate_key
might be poor.)
</para>
</listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>
- Some operations require a stronger lock when using declarative
- partitioning than when using table inheritance. For example, adding
- or removing a partition to or from a partitioned table requires taking
- an <literal>ACCESS EXCLUSIVE</literal> lock on the parent table,
- whereas a <literal>SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE</literal> lock is enough
- in the case of regular inheritance.
- </para>
- </listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>