Hi Tom,

> We put in a change about that last month:
> 
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=756349c87

Thank you for accepting my claim and updating document!
And sorry for not checking the development version of the document.


> > Note that this parameter does not allow the symbols with special meaning of
> > the URI parts, e.g. "&" and "?". 
> 
> Hm, I agree that the options part doesn't accept "&", but I don't see
> anything preventing use of a "?" there.

I have checked additional pattern about this limitation, and I found also "?" 
is not able to use in below case.
  user             : tst
  password         : test?pass
  connection string: 
tcp:postgresql://localhost/egashira?user=tst&password=test?pss

This seems to be caused by ECPGconnect's parsing routine.
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/master/src/interfaces/ecpg/ecpglib/connect.c#L371

----
                        if (strncmp(dbname + offset, "postgresql://", 
strlen("postgresql://")) == 0)
                        {

                                /*------
                                 * new style:
                                 *      
<tcp|unix>:postgresql://server[:port|:/unixsocket/path:]
                                 *      [/db-name][?options]
                                 *------
                                 */
                                offset += strlen("postgresql://");

                                tmp = strrchr(dbname + offset, '?');
                                if (tmp != NULL)        /* options given */
                                {
                                        options = ecpg_strdup(tmp + 1, lineno);
                                        *tmp = '\0';
                                }
----

In "tcp:postgresql://" style connection string, ECPGconnect searches for "?" 
from the end of the connection string to extract options part.
If "?" is in options string part (e.g. as a password value) , the extracting 
will be failed.

Regards.
Yusuke Egashira.


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 12:55 AM
To: Egashira, Yusuke/江頭 勇佑 <egashira.yus...@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: About limitation characters in ECPG's connection string

PG Doc comments form <nore...@postgresql.org> writes:
> Please add the note about the limitation characters in connection string.
> For example, I think that below explanation should be in the Parameter
> section of connection_target.

We put in a change about that last month:

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=756349c87

Although that hasn't yet propagated to any released branches,
you can see it in the "devel" version of that documentation page:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/ecpg-connect.html#ECPG-CONNECTING

> Note that this parameter does not allow the symbols with special meaning of
> the URI parts, e.g. "&" and "?". 

Hm, I agree that the options part doesn't accept "&", but I don't see
anything preventing use of a "?" there.

                        regards, tom lane




Reply via email to