On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 09:19:32PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-set-transaction.html
> Description:
>
> As an example let's take take "BEGIN"
> in the Synopsis :
> -------- Start Synopsis for BEGIN --------------------
> BEGIN [ WORK | TRANSACTION ] [ transaction_mode [, ...] ]
>
> where transaction_mode is one of:
>
> ISOLATION LEVEL { SERIALIZABLE | REPEATABLE READ | READ COMMITTED | READ
> UNCOMMITTED }
> READ WRITE | READ ONLY
> [ NOT ] DEFERRABLE
> -------- End Synopsis for BEGIN --------------------
> In this example the words to words "READ COMMITTED", "READ WRITE" should be
> bold since they are default values if I execute the statement "BEGIN;" see
> the example.
Uh, I don't think we bold the defaults in the syntax, but if we wanted
to do that, we should do it everywhere. Is that something we want? I
am afraid it would just make the default values stand out, which seems
counter-productive.
> By the way I started in "BEGIN" but here the defaults was not even present
> sow I went to "START TRANSACTION but still no indication on default values
> but finally in "SET TRANSACTION"
> There are default value for "ISOLATION LEVEL" but nothing on default value
> for "READ WRITE | READ ONLY" or "[ NOT ] DEFERRABLE".
Uh, I see in the BEGIN manual page:
If the isolation level, read/write mode, or deferrable mode is
specified, the new transaction has those characteristics, as if SET
TRANSACTION (SET_TRANSACTION(7)) was executed.
and in SET TRANSACTION:
If the isolation level, read/write mode, or deferrable mode is
specified, the new transaction has those characteristics, as if SET
TRANSACTION (SET_TRANSACTION(7)) was executed.
Is "has those characteristics" unclear?
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
