I partially agree. But with the context, it doesn't assume we want `view<->visualize` the data. It also says:
>> Another use for a materialized view is to allow faster access to data brought across from a remote system through a foreign data wrapper. It is talking about 'the view' not the graph. Yushan Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午5:16写道： > > On 9 Jan 2020, at 09:05, PG Doc comments form <nore...@postgresql.org> > wrote: > > >>>> If people want to be able to quickly graph historical sales data, ... > > > > This sentence doesn't make sense. I think it should be: > > > > --- If people want to be able to quickly grab/obtain/get historical sales > > data, ... > > > I'm not a native english speaker, but I'm pretty sure that sentence is > correct. > "graph" in this context refers to generating a graph of the data, which is > made > quite clear in the sentence below the codesnippet: > > "This materialized view might be useful for displaying a graph in > the > dashboard created for salespeople." > > cheers ./daniel -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Apologize to any possible reply delay for time differences. 对于任何由于时差未能及时回复邮件的情况表示抱歉。
