On 2020-04-21 21:04, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:10:09PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 2020-04-14 10:03, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
The example "XSLT Stylesheet for Converting SQL/XML Output to HTML" is
tagged as <figure>, but it isn't a figure, it's an example script.
It's not an example, it's an actual script that you are supposed to use.
Uh, the text said "example", and all the other figures we had used SVG
files, so it didn't see to match our other markup.
The
PDF output contains lists for examples, figures and tables and shows it
in the wrong list. We should change the tagging.
Why is it wrong to make this a figure?
I thought figure was just images. Was figure really right, or something
else? This is the only script we use? programlisting maybe?
Maybe it's just easier to remove the wrapping in either <figure> or
<example> if that is confusing.
But I request that the backpatching of this be reverted. This would
renumber all the other examples and/or figures, and then it won't be
clear what future bug reports will refer to. This issue isn't that
drastic to make that worth it.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
