On 2020-Aug-22, Tom Lane wrote: > If you don't want to go all the way and list the operators with their > input types, maybe we should just do what the OP thought was correct > and delete the duplicate operator names. It's already the case that > the table isn't telling you exactly which input types the operators > accept, so why not be a little bit fuzzier?
Well, if we're going to have a table, let's have a useful table. What's wrong with using the same contents \dAo shows? It seemed reasonable enough to me. Now of course I would suggest that other client programs such as pgAdmin ought to display what \dAo shows too ;-) -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
