Hi David, Thanks for responding.
> It is. "If specific tables are named in a locking clause, then only rows > coming from those tables are locked;" I see – thanks for pointing it out. It would be good if this sentence actually referred to "OF" by name. The section on locking clauses is long and densely written, and a direct mention of the syntax element would help the reader find the relevant information. Even an example using FOR UPDATE OF ... might be a useful addition. > I'll agree that the docs don't indicate that "table_name" has to be > unqualified. We shouldn't need to work things out by guesswork / resolving error messages. This should be in the docs so we can get it right the first time. Thanks, Alan
