Thanks for the quick resolution. Best, Federico
Ps: sorry for the previous messages in html, I had not realized that the client I was using were sending the replies like that. On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 17:28, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> writes: > > On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> So what I was remembering was some text in the section about sequence > >> functions. That probably seemed appropriate when they were the only > >> real use of regclass; but these days we have regclass-accepting > functions > >> all over, not to mention other OID alias types. I propose the attached > >> patch to move this info into the "Object Identifier Types" section. > > > That patch looks good to me. > > I think it is an improvement to have that discussed under "data types". > > Pushed, thanks for reviewing. > > regards, tom lane >
