Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2021-Jun-01, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1 for the concept, but I feel that "live in" is a bit too informal
>> for this context. I'm too caffeine-deprived to instantly come up
>> with le mot juste; but perhaps "exist within" would be an improvement?
> The glossary uses "reside in".
> ...
> I suppose that we should either use the same term that the glossary
> uses, or alternatively fix the glossary to use whatever term we decide
> to use here.
Yeah, having a standard phrasing would be good.
> I do notice now that I used the term "belong to" elsewhere in the
> glossary. That could use some cleanup.
Hmm, I like "belong to" better than these others. Maybe we should
standardize on that?
regards, tom lane
