> On 29 Jul 2021, at 21:10, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 07:15:21PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> On 29 Jul 2021, at 17:29, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 05:23:20PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>>>> On 29 Jul 2021, at 16:58, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK, I can adjust it to say "GNU split" or just skip this addition. >>>> >>>> I don't have strong feelings either way, with a slight preference for >>>> writing >>>> it as "GNU split" since it's still a good tip for a large amount of >>>> readers. >>> >>> Yes, I am on the fence for the same reasons but lean toward moving >>> forward for your same reasons. >> >> Making it two separate examples is a good idea, tipping the scale to a +1 >> from me. >> >> + If using <application>GNU split</application>, it is possible to >> A small nitpick is that we write this as GNU <application>..</application> >> elsewhere on this page (like GNU tar for example). > > OK, updated patch attached. FYI, I put the GNU inside the application > name in the first version because we specifically only want the GNU > version of that application, but I think taking it out for consistency > is fine.
LGTM -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
