On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:17 PM radiodiversion <radiodivers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I still think it would be great if this doc point was worded a little > differently in new editions. > > Suggestions are welcome. Without some idea of why you seemed to miss the two seemingly obvious references that I pointed out (including a fragment you quoted) it's hard to decide what might be an improvement. It's unappealing to consider rewriting the documentation based upon the experiences of a sample size of one without a clear rationale. David J.
