"Jonathan S. Katz" <jk...@postgresql.org> writes:
> On 5/31/22 10:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wonder whether we should update this or just remove it --- it's
>> clearly something that's likely to get missed again.
> While burdensome, +1 for updating. We don't want users to get caught by
> surprise if pg_dumpall does not work on an old version when trying to
> update to a newer version.
Further investigation shows that we've failed to update this twice in
the past six years, and failed to update a similar comment about psql
once. I fixed 'em, but I have very little hope that they'll stay fixed.
regards, tom lane
